Thread: Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion

Originally Posted by abdelaziz46

Dear Lobogabor,

Thanks a lot for all your help... I didn't really understand the Cypher pattern... Now it is absolutly clear and what I draw isn't a cypher, the C point should be the extension 127% to 141% and I didn't know that... And for the D point to be sure it must be the 78.6 XC retracement no???

Thanks a lot


Regards

Yes right, 78.6 of XC...sorry for the confusion.

Originally Posted by tankbeta

emerging gartley in USDJPY with AB=cd converging in 78.6 on XA
Attachment 3605

nice observation : im on it since this morning but didnt see that ab=cd...so i complete my snapshot with it
FE0.618@96.00 to pass for complete the Bat

Originally Posted by paulselvan

nice observation : im on it since this morning but didnt see the ab=cd...so i complete my snapshot with it
FE0.618@96.00 to pass for complete the Bat

Hey mates, are you identifying two different AB=CDs there? It looks like that.
In the first dwg that of tankbeta, if this is a bat, the AB=CD does not apply, but an extended ABCD should apply instead. Is this correct? This is why I think the 96.4 completion is too early on tankbeta`s drawing, mine is coming closer to 96 as well.
Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion

GBPUSD H1 bear gartley close to ABCD level, in addition full with lower TF bear harmonics!
Could be a chance to get trying shorts with strict trailing, or smaller sized short entries.
Any comment?
One thing is sure, even entering now at market the R/R is superissimo for a gartley .

Originally Posted by lobogabor

Hey mates, are you identifying two different AB=CDs there? It looks like that.
In the first dwg that of tankbeta, if this is a bat, the AB=CD does not apply, but an extended ABCD should apply instead. Is this correct? This is why I think the 96.4 completion is too early on tankbeta`s drawing, mine is coming closer to 96 as well.
Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion

Your absolutely right...tankbeta worked on H1 ,mine was in H4 ...not same AB=CD

Originally Posted by paulselvan

Your absolutely right...tankbeta worked on H1 ,mine was in H4 ...not same AB=CD

I understood the AB=CD was different for the two of you, what I did not understand, why. Plz comment.
As for the timeframe I do not think that bat would look much different on H1 or H4... would it?
Please give some details, so I can learn for the future.
Tnx.

Originally Posted by lobogabor

I understood the AB=CD was different for the two of you, what I did not understand, why. Plz comment.
As for the timeframe I do not think that bat would look much different on H1 or H4... would it?
Please give some details, so I can learn for the future.
Tnx.

It's 2 different HP... The H1 one has a X at 08.08.2013 and the H4 one at 13.06.2013

Hope that it is much clear now !

Regards

Originally Posted by abdelaziz46

It's 2 different HP... The H1 one has a X at 08.08.2013 and the H4 one at 13.06.2013

Hope that it is much clear now !

Regards

Thanks, will check from that angle. Both could work out their ways, right? It still does not make sense to me to have a bat with AB=CD requiremet instead of an extended ABCD.