Page 214 of 361 FirstFirst ... 114164204212213214215216224264314 ... LastLast
Results 2,131 to 2,140 of 3610
Like Tree567Likes

Thread: Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion

  1. #2131
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by abdelaziz46 View Post
    I never traded the cypher, shark or other "new age" pattern.

    Do you have some readings recommendation for me and can you tell me if they are so accurate than the others???

    Thanks

    Regards
    when i start learn about hp-two months ago-the new ones are already popularized...so i dont distinguish them from fist generation hp like bat,gartley,butterfly...
    ..about new ones ,recently lobogabor and i didnt have same shark ratio...

    ..so they must be sorted,in this way everyone can have same point of vue...
    ...even the new cypher has fast changed ...!
    Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion-sans-titre-1.png

  2. #2132
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    311
    eurusd h1 bear cypher ..against the way of 1.34..
    Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion-cypher-eurusdpng.jpg

  3. #2133
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by paulselvan View Post
    when i start learn about hp-two months ago-the new ones are already popularized...so i dont distinguish them from fist generation hp like bat,gartley,butterfly...
    ..about new ones ,recently lobogabor and i didnt have same shark ratio...

    ..so they must be sorted,in this way everyone can have same point of vue...
    ...even the new cypher has fast changed ...!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sans titre 1.png 
Views:	13 
Size:	115.5 KB 
ID:	3568
    Hi there, you are right! I see differences also. Could we just take the ones you mentioned cypher and shark, and sort out the differences between different sources?
    (and however I do not quite understand the Anti- or A- versions of those, but could be included...)
    All I see at this point - any cypher is a shark, but shark is a wider range including the ranges of cypher... also shark is an ext pattern opposing cypher, and that might make a big difference.
    I am not sure it is a worthwile effort, but anybody thinks it would give value to our profit, to research it, I would be in .

  4. #2134
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by paulselvan View Post
    when i start learn about hp-two months ago-the new ones are already popularized...so i dont distinguish them from fist generation hp like bat,gartley,butterfly...
    ..about new ones ,recently lobogabor and i didnt have same shark ratio...

    ..so they must be sorted,in this way everyone can have same point of vue...
    ...even the new cypher has fast changed ...!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sans titre 1.png 
Views:	13 
Size:	115.5 KB 
ID:	3568
    Between the cypher and shark I have identified only 1 main difference so far between sources, and that concerns the C level of the pattern:
    Cypher C should be 1,27-1,414
    1,13-1,414 (other sources)
    Shark C should be 1.13-1.618
    1.13-2.xxx (other sources? I have seen no such yet)
    D for cypher 0.786
    D for shark 0,786-0,113
    Anything else there?
    Last edited by lobogabor; 08-15-2013 at 11:34 PM. Reason: correction

  5. #2135
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by abdelaziz46 View Post
    I never traded the cypher, shark or other "new age" pattern.

    Do you have some readings recommendation for me and can you tell me if they are so accurate than the others???

    Thanks

    Regards
    abdelaziz - I have a source claiming cypher to be over 80-85 accuracy. The one having C fib between 1,27-1.414 of XA and D comleting at 0.78 of XC.. and I cannot contadict that.

  6. #2136
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by lobogabor View Post
    Between the cypher and shark I have identified only 1 main difference so far between sources, and that concerns the C level of the pattern:
    Cypher C should be 1,27-1,414
    1,13-1,414 (other sources)
    Shark C should be 1.13-1.618
    1.13-2.xxx (other sources? I have seen no such yet)
    D for cypher 0.786
    D for shark 0,786-0,113
    Anything else there?
    I'd add that FXGroundworks call shark as OXABC insteed of XABCD...and XC=[0.886..1.13]OX
    Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion-shark.png

  7. #2137
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    311
    You know what...Shark is a variation of Impulse waves quoted by S.Corney (vol 2)
    worked at posted#1967
    Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion-usdcadh4_imp.jpg
    Last edited by paulselvan; 08-16-2013 at 08:32 AM. Reason: pic

  8. #2138
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    109
    Thanks all !!!

    It's seems really good opportunities to take with this shark and cypher patterns. I'll read more on that and share it if I find something interesting, but thank you guys for all these infos!

    By the way, I got a really nice Gartley pattern on GBP/USD, with a divergence... Time to short guys !!!!

    Interactive Trading Setups Disscussion-gbpusd.jpg

    Regards

  9. #2139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by abdelaziz46 View Post
    Thanks all !!!

    It's seems really good opportunities to take with this shark and cypher patterns. I'll read more on that and share it if I find something interesting, but thank you guys for all these infos!

    By the way, I got a really nice Gartley pattern on GBP/USD, with a divergence... Time to short guys !!!!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	GBPUSD.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	46.7 KB 
ID:	3572

    Regards
    Caution! It does not meet minimum garley requirement AB=CD! That would come in @ around 1,573.
    Last edited by lobogabor; 08-16-2013 at 10:56 AM. Reason: added value

  10. #2140
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by lobogabor View Post
    Caution! It does not meet minimum garley requirement AB=CD!
    The minimum AB=CD is not the minimum requirement no??? It's preferrend but not mendatory. you draw your PRZ with the 78.6XA and 1.61BC No?

    Am I wrong???

    Thanks

    Regards

LinkBacks (?)

  1. 04-05-2014, 04:25 PM
  2. 03-30-2014, 11:19 AM
  3. 03-17-2014, 11:20 AM
  4. 03-07-2014, 11:18 PM
  5. 03-03-2014, 08:18 PM
  6. 02-25-2014, 10:40 AM
  7. 02-20-2014, 09:23 PM
  8. 12-28-2013, 10:10 PM
  9. 12-19-2013, 05:17 PM
  10. 12-04-2013, 05:55 PM
  11. 11-22-2013, 05:24 PM
  12. 11-18-2013, 08:50 PM
  13. 11-13-2013, 01:19 AM
  14. 09-23-2013, 05:14 AM
  15. 09-03-2013, 10:23 AM
  16. 09-03-2013, 09:44 AM
  17. 08-27-2013, 12:29 PM
  18. 07-31-2013, 03:32 AM
  19. 06-03-2013, 09:12 AM
  20. 05-22-2013, 04:32 PM
  21. 04-23-2013, 12:01 PM
  22. 04-04-2013, 10:39 AM
  23. 04-04-2013, 10:20 AM
  24. 04-04-2013, 03:38 AM
  25. 03-26-2013, 05:16 AM
  26. 03-23-2013, 03:34 PM
  27. 03-19-2013, 08:20 AM
  28. 01-27-2013, 08:51 PM
  29. 01-17-2013, 05:25 PM
  30. 01-10-2013, 12:46 PM
  31. 01-07-2013, 12:55 AM
  32. 12-27-2012, 10:53 AM
  33. 10-24-2012, 08:22 AM
  34. 10-04-2012, 12:57 AM
  35. 09-30-2012, 06:10 PM
  36. 09-13-2012, 07:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41