AudJpy - bull bat+bigger bull crab in an area of B of previous harmonics. Could be nice.
At least cross-checking another Aud pair.
Question - do you guys consider higher TF harmonics or do you trade those separately? Right now I do see nothing here, but to illustrate my question I attached the Jpy pictures.
I do still need to read the literature, since I was struggling with this question on my own till now.
Is there any higher TF confirmation for harmonics you found successful in your trading?
Tnx.
sly, finally I could find a table again with some of the "new" stuff in it.Originally Posted by sly_fox
Check this out for your taste and might test these with an EA / indi or manual way.
Forex-TSD
They did a nice job deleting it from all the sites I looked at.
@lobogabor
1 about audusd:
http://charts.mql5.com/2/188/audusd-...tments-inc.png so this is my first idea but i dont belive audusd can stop so 2nd idea
http://charts.mql5.com/2/188/audusd-...ents-inc-2.png why? there is strong trend line tested 3 or 4 times. Maybe audusd react for ab=cd but there is strong resistance i indicate that by blue rectangle.
2nd about pattern: thx ; )
3nd about TF i use harmonic for small time frame max 1h often m30 and i dont care about daily etc try to focus for lookin patterns which will allow you to join to the trend less risky
sly_fox thanks for the comment. I have also looked at the potential cypher forming there at the level 78 fib you marked on the 2nd drawing of AudUsd.
Concerning cypher in the harmonic table, the table is different from what I know from the T2T "cypher discoverers". In the table the point C minimum limit is @113 while the other source has minimum 127 fib requirement for cypher C.
sly_fox thanks for the comment. I have also looked at the potential cypher forming there at the level 78 fib you marked on the 2nd drawing of AudUsd.
Concerning cypher in the harmonic table, the table is different from what I know from the T2T "cypher discoverers". In the table the point C minimum limit is @113 while the other source has minimum 127 fib requirement for cypher C.
currently i test: http://1do1.biz.pl/wp-content/upload.../05/cypher.jpg i found 3 or 2 cypher(1-2day) and they work fine.
Please share your test results. Also in case of failed ones please check out if those met the 127-141.4 requirement of point C or were those in the range of 113-127. The t2t guys cited a success rate well over 80% of their cypher.
I am pretty happy with the shark as well, where C required to be fib 113-161, but the PRZ is very wide in that case, and D is supposed to be between 78.6-113 fib levels. So I am really curious of what you find in UR test.
Tnx
Here is a site link where Poruchik published EA test results for several patterns, including shark. I could not get the EA work, but I might be able to test this with other EAs. As we all know, there are drawbacks with EAs for many reasons, but my thinking is, if the EA having not the best money management set-up, and even missing things due to zig-zag recognition, filter set-up, whatsoever - what human eye might correct (the AI- so if the EA is capable of making money or at least not losing, then there is a chance. I like to test out theory with EA to get a 100% view of all instances. Maybe wrong, but that is usually my first test.
Need harmonic EA & Indicator - Page 11
Posting Permissions
567Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
