I do not know if there is any theory that invalidates.
Not many people/traders/book authors write about time analysis, therefore I was looking for my way. Nothing is 100%, game of probabilities at the end.
What is your experience with it?
thx for your answer and i agree with this approach of the eye definition but my question was also is there any theory of time that invalidate a pattern like you defined on gartley ?
I do not know if there is any theory that invalidates.
Not many people/traders/book authors write about time analysis, therefore I was looking for my way. Nothing is 100%, game of probabilities at the end.
What is your experience with it?
so if i understand what youre saying the korharmonics rectangle zone is built just with the ab=cd conditions ?
I do not remember, do not use it from the moment we came up with AMP indicator.
korHarmonics had no time analysis, maybe very minimal for some paterns. So the rectangle comes from price relationship analysis (cluster).
that's what i don't understand. How can we build a rectangle with fibo levels? what is the width? if you don't remember, it's ok.
is there an AMP Monitor free indicator ?
if you check what is possible tradable Gartley, is set of different Fibo ranges. If you make a sum of these ranges for point D you will get a rectangle.
The ideal and tradeable Gartley pattern
btw: I just checked and these values for Tradeable Gartley pattern are not 100% correct I think,...but it's not important here anyway.
ok thanks for your answers